Hate speech in social media can damage or even destroy the reputation of an individual or a company very quickly, researchers said.
Widespread opinion blames the fact that individuals generally write these things anonymously online as the reason for these posts, they said.
However, researchers from University of Zurich in Switzerland found that trolls are increasingly using their full name online.
As a result, a ban on anonymity will likely fail to prevent the feared firestorms but possibly aggravate them even more, they said.
The evaluation of more than 500,000 social-political comments from around 1,600 online petitions from a German platform 'openpetition' between 2010 and 2013 showed that individuals posting hate speech who were using their full name were even more common than anonymous trolls.
Many online news portals or social media platforms are endeavoring to put a stop to the coarsening of the language used in comments or in social networks, researchers said.
"As a means of facilitating a civilised digital culture of debate, there are often calls to scrap online anonymity," said Lea Stahel, sociology doctoral student at Zurich.
According to researchers, so many online trolls are not bothering to remain anonymous because they do not consider it necessary to remain anonymous.
Rather than purely personal acts of revenge, hate speech is often a reaction to violations of a social norm, such as compliance with environmental or plagiarism standards, or infringements of socially desirable behaviour such as political correctness.
Online trolls can also assume that they will scarcely ever be held accountable for their aggression. According to Stahel, it is considered very unlikely that a busy politician or a struggling company would pick precisely that person to sue when overwhelmed with a whole flood of insults.
This signalises a willingness to take a risk in order to state their opinion publicly, thus gaining extra trust, researchers said.
Ideally this can raise their social status, because they move in digital networks like Facebook in "Friend Groups" where their comments resonate thanks to "Shares" and "Likes".
The findings were published in the journal PLoS ONE.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
