'Nothing illegal on govt servants being placed under

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : May 24 2015 | 12:57 AM IST
The Madras High Court bench in Madurai has declined to quash the retirement-time suspension order of a Civil Supplies Corporation officer, saying there was nothing illegal about government servants being suspended on the day of their superannuation.
"There is nothing illegal about government servants being denied peaceful retirement and being placed under suspension on the day of their superannuation," Justice S Vaidyanathan said while dismissing the petition of one V Murugan who was slapped with five charges a few days before his retirement on April 1 this year and placed under suspension on March 30.
Stating that there was no hard and fast rule that an employee cannot be placed under suspension on the last day of his service, the court said if the petitioner's prayer was allowed, "then persons like him may commit misconduct during the last month of their service and take a plea that no charge memo or suspension order can be levied against the employee."
The Judge further said that as long as there was an employee-employer relationship, the employer has every right to issue charge memo and place the employee under suspension and proceed against the employee as per rules.
Murugan, who was Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Officer, had challenged the validity of charge memos and the suspension order.
He sought a direction from the court to quash the the orders and direct the authorities to extend all monetary benefits, pending salary, leave benefits and all other terminal benefits with continuity of service to him.
The department submitted that Murugan was issued charge memos in the first week of March 2015 and was suspended a day prior to his retirement.
Noting that the regional manager of the Corporation was competent to issue suspension orders, the department said one of the charges against Murugan was that he had signed the attendance register even without attending office.
Justice Vaidyanathan, who directed the authorities to review the suspension order periodically, said the authorities could issue him a charge sheet and complete the inquiry as early as possible, 'preferably within one year.'
"It is also open to the authorities to conduct the inquiry proceedings on a day-to-day basis, the judge said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 24 2015 | 12:57 AM IST

Next Story