O'Sullivan asked to explain on match-fixing following Lee ban

Image
Press Trust of India London
Last Updated : Sep 18 2013 | 4:56 PM IST
Five-time world champion Ronnie O'Sullivan has been asked by the World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association to prove his claim that Stephen Lee may not be the only top-level cueist to be involved in match-fixing, or face possible sanction over his response.
Former world number five Lee was yesterday found guilty of fixing seven snooker matches in 2008 and 2009 by the disciplinary committee of the WPBSA.
England's Lee faces a lifetime ban after the verdict was confirmed by Nigel Mawer, the chairman of the disciplinary committee. The sanction will be announced at a separate hearing on September 24.
Following comments made by O'Sullivan on Twitter, World Snooker Chairman Barry Hearn today said, "We take these type of allegations very seriously. We have written to Ronnie asking him to explain his comments and to provide details of any match fixing and the names of the players that he is referring to.
"Clearly, to make these type of allegations without informing the Governing Body through the correct channels is wholly unacceptable and extremely damaging to the sport. We await his response. We will not be making any further comment on this matter until it has been investigated further," Hearn said in a statement.
Reigning world champion O'Sullivan had claimed the scale of match-fixing in the sport could be much bigger than what people suspected and Lee's case may not be the only one.
He accused the snooker authorities of not doing enough to bring corruption in the sport to light.
"I've heard there's many more players who throw snooker matches .. I suppose Steve lee was just caught out," O'Sullivan wrote on his twitter account.
"I just love putting it out there bring it all out in the open.. Nothing like a bit of transparency is what I say. No need to worry if you got nothing to hide. But plenty of people have got loads to hide. That's why there is no free speech. There (sic) hiding. They will prob fine me for talking about it.. They don't like you doing that.. Like to keep things under the carpet.." he added.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 18 2013 | 4:56 PM IST

Next Story