"The President's commitment to the principle of ensuring we have a judiciary that looks like the rest of the country is rock-solid," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters at his daily news conference.
"And the other principle that he has strongly adhered to is making sure that he's choosing the best person for the job, and I think he's demonstrated over the course of his seven years in office that it is absolutely possible to do both," he added.
"I can tell you that the President considered a diverse array of candidates, and I think that's what you'd expect considering the diverse array of individuals that the White House consulted in advance of the President making his decision. The President took that advice quite seriously and considered a diverse array of candidates," he said.
"The President ultimately settled on Chief Judge Garland for one reason, and one reason only, and that is simply that he believes that Chief Judge (Merrick) Garland is the best person in America to do that job. And that's how the President made the decision," Earnest said.
He pointed out that Obama appointed the third and fourth
women to serve on the Supreme Court in Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, besides appointing 117 minorities to the federal judiciary which is more than any other President.
"He has appointed 26 African American women to the federal bench. That is more than any other President. He's appointed 37 Hispanics to the federal bench. That is more than any other President.
Earnest also refuted the impression that age played a factor in Obama's nomination process.
"The President, in choosing Judge Garland, chose somebody who's 63. Some of his other candidates were roughly 15 years younger. If this candidate, Judge Garland, is confirmed, that means the President's legacy on the Supreme Court will be significantly shorter than it could have been if he had chosen someone who is younger.
"I'm not aware that age played any role in the President's decision-making," Earnest said.
"Maybe there are some people who would suggest that it would have, but the President was looking for the very best person for the job. And regardless of age, the President was focused on choosing somebody who has the proper temperament and the unquestioned legal credentials and a commitment to public service to do this job," he argued.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
