Online user ratings not good indicators of product quality

Image
Press Trust of India Washington
Last Updated : May 02 2016 | 4:13 PM IST
The belief that online user ratings are good indicators of product quality is largely an illusion, yet many consumers rely on the information while making purchase decisions, a new study has found.
Almost all retailers provide user ratings on their websites, the researchers said.
For the study, researchers examined user ratings for 1,272 products across 120 product categories, such as car seats, bike helmets, sunblock, air filters, smoke alarms and blood pressure monitors.
The analyses show a very low correspondence between average user ratings of products on an e-commerce portal and product ratings based on objective tests found in consumer reports.
"The likelihood that an item with a higher user rating performs objectively better than an item with a lower user rating is only 57 per cent," said Bart de Langhe, professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in US.
"A correspondence of 50 per cent would be random, so user ratings provide very little insight about objective product performance," de Langhe said.
The study also found that the user ratings do not predict the resale value of used products.
"Products with better reliability and performance retain more of their value over time," said de Langhe.
"If average user ratings reflect objective quality, they should correlate positively with resale values. The fact that they don't casts more doubt on the validity of user ratings," he said.
Researchers also examined what information consumers rely on when judging the quality of products on the e-commerce website.
They found that consumers rely very heavily on the average user rating, which is presented front and centre.
They do this regardless of whether the average rating is based on a small or a large sample of consumers.
"This is a mistake. Oftentimes, there are just not enough ratings for a product or there is too much disagreement among reviewers," said de Langhe.
"In this case, consumers should not trust the average very much, but they do nonetheless," he said.
The study was published in the Journal of Consumer Research.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 02 2016 | 4:13 PM IST

Next Story