In the proposed Cinematograph Bill, a panel headed by former Punjab and Haryana High Court Chief Justice Mukul Mudgal has added a provision specifically stating that only the central government can pass an order of suspension of exhibition of any film and not any state or UT administration.
Many state governments have in the past resorted to use provisions like section 144 of the CrPC, which bars assembly of four or more persons to prohibit screening of films which they felt would affect law and order.
In a draft of the proposed Cinematograph Bill, the panel has provided a provision which says that the central government may suo moto or at the behest of a state government act to prevent the exhibition of a film where it is likely to cause an imminent breach of public order.
The draft adds that no such order should be passed unless a show cause notice setting out the grounds on which action has been taken. It also provides that any person may appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against any such order.
