Ontario resolution: Akali Dal seeks withdrawal of MEA response

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 10 2017 | 6:42 PM IST
Ruling NDA constituent Akali Dal today criticised the External Affairs Ministry for rejecting a a motion adopted by the Assembly of Ontario in Canada which had termed the 1984 anti-Sikh riots as a "genocide".
The issue was raised in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha by Akali Dal members who demanded that the External Affairs Ministry should withdraw its statement and the External Affairs Minister should make a statement in Parliament.
Raising the issue in the Rajya Sabha, Akali leader Naresh Gujral said, "I demand that the statement by the MEA be withdrawn and the External Affairs Minister make a statement in the House."
Referring to the events of November 1984 after assassination of Indira Gandhi, he said, "There was a state-condoned massacre of innocent Sikhs that went on for three horrible days and nights. The government and police refused to intervene and the minority community was targeted only because of their identity, their beard, their turban and their names."
Congress leader Anand Sharma objected to the remarks but Gujral went ahead, saying the November 1984 incidents were not a riot as "successive Congress governments have tried to make us believe".
In fact, many Hindus and Muslims had risked their lives to save their Sikh friends, he said.
Raising a point of order, Sharma said "this is Parliament of India. Can you allow a statement that there was a state-sponsored genocide on record".
To this, Deputy Chairman P J Kurien said he would go through the records and "expunge whatever is to be expunged".
In the Lok Sabha, Akali Dal member Prem Singh Chandumajra raised the issue and criticised the MEA for rejecting the motion.
He also demanded that the Ministry spokesperson should withdraw the statement.
Last week, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Gopal Baglay had said, "We have noted the passage of a Private Member's Motion in the Legislative Assembly of Ontario on April 6. We reject this misguided Motion which is based on a limited understanding of India, its Constitution, society, ethos, rule of law and the judicial process.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 10 2017 | 6:42 PM IST

Next Story