Pass orders in 6 weeks on PIL seeking to revisit prohibition

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jan 05 2018 | 11:40 PM IST
The Madras High Court today directed the Tamil Nadu government to pass within six weeks orders on a PIL seeking to revisit its prohibition policy and retail liquor vending rules on relocating or setting up of state-run TASMAC liquor shops or bars in residential areas.
The first bench, comprising Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Abdul Quddhose, gave the directive on a PIL by K Balu, the president of the Advocates' Forum for Social Justice.
The petitioner submitted that the Tamil Nadu Liquor Retail Vending (in Shops and Bars) Rules do not stipulate any distance rule on location of liquor shops in residential areas.
He said Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) can locate retail vending shops next to a house, unmindful of the disturbance it might cause to families. So there should be some filters in locating the retail vending liquor shops/bars in residential areas, he said.
The petitioner said authorities do not consider objections by the people in the area in setting up the retail liquor shops and the bar attached with it.
Any natural, spontaneous and public agitation against the location of liquor shops or bars is "ruthlessly" handled by police as if they have committed grave crimes, he contended.
"In a democracy functioning under the principles of 'of the people, by the people and for the people', this kind of repression and registering criminal cases against the peaceful agitators is against fundamental rights," Balu said.
He submitted that the Bombay Prohibition Act provides for a space for objection from the public over opening of liquor shops and that the Tamil Nadu government can have no reservation in considering similar provisions in its existing prohibition policy.
Balu claimed that he sent a representation to the state government suggesting amending the rules on setting up liquor shops and bars in residential areas at par with the prohibition policy of the Mahrashtra government
However, there was no response, he added.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 05 2018 | 11:40 PM IST

Next Story