PB could have done better over the years: Venkaiah Naidu

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 28 2016 | 3:22 PM IST
Public broadcaster Prasar Bharati could have done much better over the years and there is a need for it to improve relations with the government, says Information and Broadcasting minister M Venkaiah Naidu.
"Prasar Bharati could have done much better over the years. When I took a review recently, I was surprised by the range of issues and problems facing the Prasar Bharati. I don't believe in Prasar Bhharti and the Ministry blaming each other for whatever problems being faced," Naidu told PTI.
In the past there have often been reports of disagreements between Prasar Bharati and I and B ministry officials on a range of issues.
Incumbent CEO Jawahar Sarcar, who is scheduled to demit office on November 4, had written to the government earlier during the UPA regime expressing his differences.
"In Prasar Bharati there is a scope for lot of improvement. And there is need for improvement of relations between the government and Prasar Bharati also," Naidu said.
He said that the money for the public broadcaster is "after all" given by government, which is accountable to Parliament.
Prasar Bharati officials are not going to come and answer questions in Parliament. It is government, Naidu said adding that they have to work smoothly.
"But at the same time functional autonomy has to be given to Prasar Bharati," he emphasised.
Asked about the appointment process for a new CEO, Naidu said the appointment of the CEO is not in the hands of the ministry of his ministry.
There is a committee headed by the Vice President of India, while the government only facilitates, he said.
He, however, added that Government would certainly like to have a CEO, who could make a difference and provide the desired effective leadership and lead the organisation forward in the intensely competitive media scenario.
Referring to Sircar, who had been appointed during the UPA regime, Naidu said "We (the government) have not forced anybody."
"Even the gentleman who is resigning. He has done on his own. He met me and discussed with me that he wanted to take voluntary retirement. You must be considerate to a person who has worked as a senior bureaucrat for years," he said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 28 2016 | 3:22 PM IST

Next Story