Petition in HC says appeals of celebrities heard out-of-turn

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Jul 20 2015 | 4:32 PM IST
A convict has alleged that appeals of celebrities were being heard out-of-turn while that of others like him were pending endlessly, following which the Bombay High Court today directed its Registry to file a report on July 24 on how many such appeals were waiting for final hearing.
The order was given by a bench headed by Chief Justice Mohit Shah which was hearing a petition objecting to appeals of celebrities, including film actors Shiney Ahuja and Salman Khan, against their conviction being heard expeditiously.
Shashikala Bhagwan Gangurde filed the petition on behalf of her incarcerated husband and many other convicts who eagerly wait in jails for many years to get bail and struggle to ensure that their appeals are listed for final hearing.
The petitioner cited the case of Shiney who was convicted in March 2011 on charges of raping his maid, saying his appeal has been listed already for final hearing.
It also referred to the case of Salman who was recently sentenced to five-year jail term in a hit-and-run case in which one person was killed and four others were injured. The petition alleged that Salman's appeal too has been listed out-of-turn for final hearing.
The petitioner's counsel, Aparna Vatkar, argued it was discriminatory on the part of respondents -- The Registrar General (Judicial) of High Court and Maharashtra government -- in placing all matters of celebrities and high-profile personalities for final hearing on an urgent basis, in spite of being filed much later.
The petition asked whether the respondents were justified in placing of appeals of celebrities for final hearing on out-of-turn basis while ignoring poor persons who are still languishing behind bars.
It also wondered whether the authorities were justified in having "discriminatory" attitude while functioning in the temple of justice.
The petitioner submitted that her husband was convicted in a murder case in 2009 and he had urged for bail, but the plea was rejected. The high court had directed the Registry to place his appeal for final hearing in October 2009, but till date it has not come up for hearing.
It also cited another case of a young boy who was in love with a girl whom he later married. On a complaint filed by his mother-in-law, the 27-year-old boy was convicted on rape charge and his appeal is still pending.
There are many others like him who eagerly wait for their appeals to be listed for final hearing in high court, said the petition.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 20 2015 | 4:32 PM IST

Next Story