PIL in HC against government's 'blacklists'

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 16 2015 | 7:32 PM IST
A PIL was today moved in the Delhi High Court challenging the constitutional validity of 'blacklists' maintained by the Centre since 1984 which contain names of some NRIs and persons of Indian origin who have been denied entry into the country on national security grounds.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath after hearing arguments of the government and the petitioner, Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee, listed the matter for orders on January 8.
The committee has contended that most of the persons named in the lists are Sikhs and thus the government's action was confined to a particular community.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Sanjay Jain denied the allegation and contended that such petitions would give rise to "communal overtones".
The ASG and central government standing counsel Anil Soni questioned how the committee can champion the cause of those people who due to their antecedents may not be conducive to the security of the country.
The bench was also provided the process followed by the government while reviewing these lists to add and delete names from it.
The committee in its plea has alleged that the blacklists are "unconstitutional, illegal and arbitrary", as there was no legal sanctity attached to them and there is no law or policy for providing any legal system for preparing such lists.
Persons affected are not even given an opportunity to be heard, the petition contended and sought that these people be allowed to enter the country and in case there is any litigation/complaint against them they should be subjected to the law.
The committee sought directions to the government to frame guidelines for providing a legal mechanism to prepare, maintain and periodically review the blacklists in consonance with the Constitution and the Citizenship Act "so as to ensure that appropriate and effective legal remedy and mechanism is made available in India to all the affected persons and their relatives".
It has also sought quashing of all the blacklists prepared by the government and a direction to the Centre to produce details of the materials and policies based on which the lists were prepared.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 16 2015 | 7:32 PM IST

Next Story