PIL in HC on detrimental effect of pet coke use on air quality

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 19 2018 | 6:40 PM IST

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought responses of the Centre and AAP government on a PIL which claimed use of petroleum coke with sulphur content of more than 1.2 per cent by industries in the national capital region was having a detrimental effect on air quality.

A bench of Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice V K Rao also issued notice to the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), its subordinate bodies in Punjab, Rajasthan, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Delhi, as well as the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) seeking their replies to the plea which claimed that use of petroleum coke (pet coke) of higher sulphur content than 1.2 per cent makes the ambient air quality "toxic" and was "harmful for human beings".

The petition by the city resident Vinay Kumar Dubey has alleged that though Delhi banned use of furnace oil and pet coke in 1996, these continued to be used in the national capital region (NCR) by aluminium industries, cement factories, dyeing units, paper mills, brick kilns and ceramic manufacturers.

It said that even as the Environment Ministry put restrictions on import of pet coke into NCR due to the high pollution levels here, recently BIS allowed use of pet coke with suplhur content of up to 3.5 per cent by aluminium industries and the CPCB and Environment Pollution Control Authority (EPCA) concurred with the decision without first carrying out a scientific study of the impact.

The petition has sought directions to the industries, especially those manufacturing aluminium, which are operating in the adjoining states of Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh to use calcined pet coke which has suplhur content between 1-1.2 per cent.

Apart from that it has sought quashing of the BIS notification of October 3, 2018, which increased the upper limit of sulphur content in pet coke to 3.5 per cent.

The petitioner has claimed that increasing the upper limit would lead to rise in amount of pollutants released into the environment by such industries.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 19 2018 | 6:40 PM IST

Next Story