"We are not inclined to entertain this public Interest Litigation for the reason that the issue is of Legislative Exercise having social ramifications and it is for the Government to examine the issue,"the first bench,comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M Sathyanarayanan, said.
The judges pointed out that a Division Bench of the Madras High Court at Madurai, dealing with a petition on a similar matter, had made suggestions to the Government for its consideration.
This was the reason why most marriages conducted at these ages lead to failure in life, he contended.
He further contended that it was the bounden duty of the Central and State Governments to enhance the ages, which is often recommended by various scientists and intellectuals.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
