PIL urges probe into role of Ajit Pawar in Irrigation scam

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Aug 01 2013 | 7:25 PM IST
A petitioner in a PIL seeking a CBI probe into the multi-crore irrigation scam in Maharashtra has urged the Bombay High Court to also order an inquiry into the role of Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar for alleged corruption in execution of projects.
Activist Praveen Wategaonkar has accused Pawar of conniving with officials in irregular award of contracts for projects, causing losses to the public exchequer.
Pawar, who was state's water resource minister between 1999 and 2009, had resigned last year following media reports about alleged irregularities to the tune of Rs 20,000 crore in irrigation projects.
He was later reinstated after a government White Paper gave him a clean chit.
In the affidavit, Wategaonkar has alleged that the procedures adopted in regard to Jamda and Balganga projects of Konkan Irrigation Development Corporation indicate that sanctioning of contractor claims, award of contracts and cost escalations were vitiated due to arbitrariness, nepotism, malafides, causing loss to the exchequer.
He said the then WRD Minister appeared to be complicit along with erstwhile Konkan Irrigation Development Corporation (KIDC) Officials and Contractor M/s F. A. Constructions.
"This needs to be enquired into and FIR should be filed against Minister Ajit Pawar, erstwhile KIDC Officials and the contractor for entering into conspiracy and corruption under the Prevention of corruption Act", said Wategaonkar in the affidavit filed yesterday.
The case is slated to come up for hearing before a division bench on August 5.
The affidavit said that as per information available, Jamda contract was initially awarded to M/s F.A constructions for Rs 75 crores to which additional work quantities (of twice the original price), taking the total contract value to Rs 233 crore.
"This deprived other bidders the chance to bid or offer a more competitive price for the bundled/bigger work quantities, resulting in loss to exchequer and contrary to public interest," the affidavit alleged.
In case of Gadnadi project, it said, the Dam construction contract was initially awarded to M/s F.A Constructions for Rs 50 crore to which additional work quantities of Rs 219 crores (four times the original price) were later added, thereby depriving other bidders the chance to bid or offer a more competitive price for the bigger work quantities, resulting in loss to exchequer.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 01 2013 | 7:25 PM IST

Next Story