A plea, filed by the resident welfare association of the area concerned, alleged that the order to shut one of 69 such dispensaries was "illegal" as it would affect around 2.50 lakh people of the area which include the elderly too.
It said the order was without providing a proper alternative arrangement for the dispensary.
The petitioner also said no complaint was filed by or is pending before the Delhi government against the dispensary, on which it may have been closed.
"As per the rules and regulation of National Rural Health Mission, the medical facility must be provided to the residents through dispensary upon the 50,000 population, and against it the said dispensary is providing medical facility to approximately 2.50 lakh people," the plea filed by advocate A P Singh said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
