One of the pleas was mentioned before a bench of justices B D Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva which listed it for hearing before the appropriate court on January 18.
The Delhi government in its order issued on January 6 had warned that institutions which violate the direction could be taken over by the education department.
Seeking stay of operation of the order, a plea by Forum for Promotion of Quality Education For All, said the "order is absolutely without jurisdiction and is thus, liable to be quashed".
Besides this plea, Action Committee of Unaided Recognized Private Schools, consisting of more than 400 private unaided recognised schools functioning in Delhi, also moved the high court stating that they are also "aggrieved by the absolutely illegal, arbitrary, whimsical and unconstitutional order" issued by Delhi government's Directorate of Education (DoE).
The committee further said that in 1973, Parliament
enacted Delhi School Education Act (DSE Act) and also framed Delhi School Education Rules (DSE Rules) thereunder, "thereby recognizing and conferring maximum autonomy upon private unaided recognized schools functioning in Delhi, to regulate their own admissions in a fair and rational manner".
Announcing the decision taken at a meeting of the state's cabinet, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on January 6 had called the management quota the breeding ground for "biggest scandal" in the education sector in the country and said his government will not be a "mute spectator" to it.
The AAP government had also scrapped 62 "arbitrary and discriminatory" criteria listed by schools on their websites for admissions.
As per the Delhi government, the decision came in the midst of the admission process for nursery classes in over 2,500 private schools in the capital.
Earlier, the high court, in an order, had asked the Delhi government not to micro-manage the admission process following which Education Department had allowed the schools to frame their respective criteria and put them on their websites.
Kejriwal had said certain criteria put out by the schools were "very shocking" and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution relating to equality before law.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
