Poaching case: Hearing against Salman's conviction begins in

Image
Press Trust of India Jodhpur
Last Updated : Nov 16 2015 | 8:57 PM IST
Ten years after actor Salman Khan was sentenced by a lower court in two cases of killing chinkaras, hearing on his appeal against the sentence in one of these cases started in Rajasthan High Court here today.
While opening the hearing, Khan's counsel Mahesh Bora questioned the two inspections of the gypsy, allegedly used by Khan for poaching.
The lawyer questioned the "difference" in the reports of both of these inspections carried out at a gap of five days. The first inspection was done by the forest officer and the second by the police, a day after filing of the FIR.
"While the first report mentioned some faded blood-like stains in the gypsy, the second report mentioned finding of hair strands and six pellets in the same gypsy, which was interestingly in possession of the forest department then," Bora argued.
He also raised question about the theory of the use of arms by Khan in the poaching and claimed that the arms in question were not with the actor. The actor's lawyer alleged that the arms were later brought from Mumbai.
"When no weapon was used in the alleged poaching, how could they be connected with the poaching," Bora questioned.
The hearing will continue tomorrow.
The actor was booked for poaching of two chinkaras in Bhawad area of Jodhpur on September 26-27, 1998 during the shooting of his movie 'Hum Saath Saath Hain'.
There were eight accused in this case. Leaving Khan and Satish Shah rest were locals.
The court of Chief Judicial Magistrate had sentenced Khan for one year on February 17, 2006. All the remaining accused were acquitted.
The actor appealed against the order in the Sessions court while the state government appealed simultaneously in the High Court for the enhancement of the sentence and challenging the acquittal of other accused.
"The appeal of Khan was later shifted to the High Court considering the two other appeals by the state in the High Court so that the hearing of all the appeals could progress together," said one of the government counsels Mahipal Bishnoi.
Another appeal of the actor, against his conviction for five years in the second case of chinkara killing, is also pending before the High Court.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 16 2015 | 8:57 PM IST

Next Story