Special judge of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) court Om Prakash Mishra granted bail to Prajapati, Vikas Verma and Amrendra Singh alias Mintu.
The court asked Prajapati to furnish two sureties of Rs 1 lakh each and a personal bond of the same amount and directed the accused that they would not affect trial or influence the witnesses during trial and remain in the territorial jurisdiction of the court during the trial.
The court observed that since she did not complain to the police or the competent court despite claiming that they had been committing rape on her for last three years, it was an indication that she had given implied consent.
It also observed in the order that the circumstances revealed that the accused were implicated in the case due to malafide intention.
In his bail order, the judge said there was contradiction in the statements of the woman and her daughter as recorded under section 161 of CrPC and 164 of the CrPC.
"Now after three years of the alleged incident she has leveled the allegations. The incident took place three years ago and it was repeated time and again but the woman did not approach the police or court for lodging her FIR. This goes to prove that the woman had given her consent for cohabitation," the court observed.
An FIR was registered against 49-year-old Prajapati and six others on February 17 on a Supreme Court directive.
When asked about the bail granted to his former cabinet colleague, Akhilesh said, "It's good that he got bail.
Please tell me if there is anything wrong in it. " After being on the run for nearly a month, Prajapati (49) was arrested from the Aashiyana area here on March 15 and was sent to jail for allegedly raping a woman and attempting to rape her minor daughter in 2014.
The six others had been arrested earlier.
Prajapati had approached the Supreme Court to get a stay on his arrest.
At the time of his arrest, Prajapati had claimed that he was innocent and the charges were a conspiracy to malign him.
The former minister had said that he was prepared for a narco test to bring out the truth and also demanded a similar test on the minor victim.
The allegations against Prajapati were raked by the BJP during the state assembly elections to attack the then Akhilesh government.
The Supreme Court order to file a police complaint against Prajapati had come just two days before the third phase of polling in the seven-phase state elections which saw Samajwadi Party winning only 47 of the 403 assembly seats while the BJP and its allies bagged 325 seats.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
