Police sources said today that if the policemen were found to have intruded into the privacy of people and violated laws they would face departmental action even as the Human Rights panel mulled registering a case.
Slamming the act of moral policing as very "funny and stupid", former Mumbai Police Commissioner Julio Ribeiro sought to know under which rules the hotel rooms were raided.
Striking a different note, state Finance Minister Sudhir Mungantiwar said said there is "no moral policing" and that police must be encouraged for "good things."
Mumbai Police Commissioner Rakesh Maria had on Sunday directed ACP (North) Fatehsingh Patil to carry out an inquiry into the raids.
Maria issued the orders after the raids sparked public outrage with many raising questions as to why consenting adults cannot stay together.
"Yes, on the basis of a report published in a daily, we have initiated an inquiry into the conduct of police officials and would seek details of action (raids) from Police Commissioner," MSHRC Chairmam Justice S R Bannurmath told PTI.
"I have to make an inquiry and call for the report from the Police Commissioner. If we come to know that innocent persons were troubled unnecessarily, we will take further action," he said.
Patil said he has started inquiring with the policemen who were involved in the raids. "Considering the magnitude of the raids by police, the scope of inquiry becomes very wide."
"I will also have to talk and inquire with managers or concerned staff of hotels, resorts and lodges where the raids took place," he said.
A preliminary report on the probe will be submitted in a few days, but the final report will take time, the ACP said while refusing to divulge further details of the inquiry.
Later, 61 people, including 13 couples, were arrested under section 110 (indecent behaviour in public) of Maharashtra Police Act.
However, they were let off after being fined Rs 1,200 each with an undertaking that they will appear before the local magistrate when required.
Police had also rescued three women under Prevention of Immoral Trafficking Act and sent them to shelter home.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
