Appearing for Rajkumar Pandian, an IPS officer discharged from the case, Jethmalani said Shaikh and his aide Tulsiram Prajapati, who was also killed in another alleged fake encounter, were notorious gangsters, wanted by police in three states.
Arguing before the court against a petition challenging Pandian's discharge, he claimed Shaikh was a terrorist with links to the fugitive mafia don Dawood Ibrahim.
"Both Sohrabuddin and Prajapati were criminals and extortionists who had several cases registered against them," Jethmalani said.
Sohrabuddin was wanted by police in Gujarat, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, he said.
"The police had been trying to arrest them. When Sohrabuddin was finally arrested in 2005 and was possibly shot by the police while he was trying to flee, the politically motivated CBI of that time built a story of a fake encounter," Jethmalani said, obliquely targeting the then UPA government.
"What are you trying to say?" asked Justice Revati Mohite-Dere.
Jethmalani replied that he was merely saying that the CBI "today is much more balanced."
The judge shot back, asking "Is that why it refuses to provide any assistance to this court?"
Justice Mohite-Dere has been conducting day-to-day hearing of petitions filed by the CBI and Rubabuddin Shaikh, Sohrabuddin's brother, challenging the discharge of five of the 14 police officers accused in the case, since February 9.
Sohrabuddin's wife Kausar Bi, who was with him, disappeared and was believed to have been killed and her body burnt to destroy evidence.
Of the 38 people charged by the CBI in the case, 15, including senior IPS officers D G Vanzara, Pandian and Dinesh MN, and BJP president Amit Shah were discharged by the special CBI court in Mumbai between August 2016 and September 2017. Shah was the minister of state for home in Gujarat when the encounters took place.
Jethmalani also said that though Pandian was in Ahmedabad on the day of Sohrabuddin's death, the IPS officer had no role in it.
While the CBI's primary evidence was the testimony of Nathuba Jadeja, the driver of the vehicle in which Sohrabuddin and Kausar Bi were taken to the site of the encounter, he was an unreliable witness, the lawyer said.
In his statement before the magistrate, Jadeja had said that Pandian was sitting in the same vehicle, and Pandian and Vanzara were present when Kausar Bi's body was burnt.
The hearing will continue tomorrow.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
