Purohit's bail is process of the judiciary: Rijiju

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 21 2017 | 5:07 PM IST
Union minister Kiren Rijiju today dismissed a Congress leader's accusations against the government on Lt Col Shrikant Purohit getting bail in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case and said whoever deserves justice would get it.
There was no conspiracy about it, the minister of state for home said when asked for a response to Congress general secretary Digvijaya Singh's comment. He added that it was a "process of the judiciary" and the government did not need to intervene.
"What is the conspiracy about it? The Congress has the habit of raising this issue. Why should we intervene? This is a process (that was) started a long time back and it's a process of the judiciary. Why should we intervene?
"Whosoever deserves justice will get it. My saying anything won't change it," Rijiju told reporters on the sidelines of an event of the border guarding force ITBP.
He added that he would not like to comment on statements made by Digvijaya Singh on the issue.
"He (Digvijaya Singh) has the habit of saying all these things. Why should I respond to that?," the minister said.
The Congress general secretary had tweeted saying: "Col Purohit gets Bail. It was expected as the present BJP Govt is protecting all the accused connected with RSS in all Bomb Blast cases."
"NIA Chief has been given two extensions to ensure their acquittal. He may now be further rewarded for a suitable post retirement position," he added in another tweet.
A bench of Justices R K Agrawal and A M Sapre of the Supreme Court today granted the relief to Purohit, saying they were setting aside the Bombay High Court order by which the bail was denied.
The apex court said it has imposed certain conditions on Purohit while granting bail.
On August 17, Purohit had told the apex court that he had been caught in the "political crossfire" and languishing in jail for nine years.
Seven people were killed in a bomb blast on September 29, 2008, at Malegaon, a communally-sensitive textile town in Nasik district of north Maharashtra.
A special MCOCA court had earlier ruled that the ATS had wrongly applied this law against Sadhvi Pragya Thakur, Purohit and nine others.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 21 2017 | 5:07 PM IST

Next Story