The court said the chain of conspiracy and money trail was incomplete in the absence of the bankers and held that prima facie, there was sufficient material to make 32 officials of five public sector banks as accused.
According to the CBI charge sheet filed in 2012, Paramount Airways Pvt Ltd (PAPL), its managing director M Thiagarajan, then CMD of Oriental Insurance Company Ltd (OICL) M Ramadoss and three other officers were accused of causing wrongful loss to the five banks and the insurance company, against which claims of Rs 442 crore were raised due to payment defaults by the airline.
Initially, the CBI had said that the probe against the bankers was incomplete and sought time to complete the investigation. In July 2014, the investigating officer (IO) filed a report stating that there was no prosecutable evidence against the bankers and its 2012 charge sheet against other accused be treated as final.
It granted three months to the IO for placing the entire material before the competent sanctioning authority to take a decision.
Regarding the bankers' role in the conspiracy, the CBI prosecutor had argued that there was no need to summon them as the investigating agency could not find sufficient material to proceed against them despite their specific roles. He also said that the agency has recommended departmental enquiry against the bank officials.
After perusing the documents, the judge noted that the allegations against the bankers were later departmentally ratified by the banks to help themselves.
"On the basis of identical material the officers of the insurance company have been summoned as accused in this case and keeping in view the fact that the predecessor court had taken cognisance for the offence of conspiracy, the ratification shall have little effect and without the bankers who were involved in sanctioning of loan without proper verifications, the chain relating to offence of conspiracy is not complete," the court said.
It had alleged that Chennai-based PAPL had taken credit insurance from OICL for its multiple bank guarantees to cover its transactions with state-owned oil companies.
As the airline allegedly defaulted in paying the oil companies under the contract guarantee, the oil firms invoked bank guarantees and the banks in turn raised the claims of Rs 442 crore on OICL, the CBI had claimed.
The probe agency has alleged that Ramadoss of OICL entered into a criminal conspiracy with Thiagrajan, abused his official position and favoured the airline in issuance of 220 credit insurance policies during 2005-10.
The credit insurance policies were used in securing multiple bank guarantees from SBI, BOI, Indian Bank, Andhra Bank and IDBI to cover its transactions with PSU oil firms and to meet expenses relating to fuel, aircraft, lease, rent airport charges and others, it has claimed.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
