In a direction that could further fuel the deeply divisive debate over beef consumption and vigilantism in the name of cow protection, Justice Mahesh Chand Sharma said the state's chief secretary and advocate general will be the legal custodians of cow.
"Nepal is a Hindu nation (sic) and has declared cow as national animal. India is a predominantly agricultural country based on animal rearing. As per Article 48 and 51A (g) (of the Constitution) it is expected from the state government that they would take action to get a legal entity for cow in this country," the judge said in the order passed on his last day in office.
Later, Justice Sharma told a TV news channel that his directions were recommendatory in nature and not binding.
"It (action against those who kill cows) is the voice of my soul, your soul, everybody's soul. Law has stemmed from 'dharma' (religion) and not vice-versa," he said.
When the reporter asked him for the rationale behind declaring cow slaughter a heinous crime, he said,"There cannot be a more heinous crime than this. Cow is like mother. She saves people from different diseases."
Justice Sharma's suggestions came amid a firestorm of protests raging in several parts of the country, particularly the southern states of Kerala and Tamil Nadu against a new notification issued by the Centre banning sale and purchase of cattle at animal markets for slaughter.
In Kerala, where beef consumption is legal, the Leftist government discussed a proposal to call a meeting of all chief ministers to discuss the contentious ban. West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has been most vocal against the ban, and has refused to accept it. She has asked the state officials not to implement the provisions of the Centre's notification.
"We want to call a meeting of all chief ministers to discuss the issue relating to the ban," Vijayan told reporters here after a cabinet meeting.
Asked if any date had been finalised for the proposed chief ministers' meeting, Vijayan said said he wanted it to be held at the earliest.
Vijayan said the state government cannot accept the new regulations. "This has to be questioned legally as it is unconstitutional," he told journalists in Thiruvananthapuram.
In Tamil Nadu, where protests have been going on for the last several days, including by way of hosting 'beef festivals', the opposition DMK launched a stinging attack on the Modi government, saying a situation has arisen where "we should eat only what the prime minister desires".
Leading a DMK protest in Chennai against the ban, party working president M K Stalin also warned of "another Marina revolution" (on the lines of pro-jallikattu stir) if the recent notification on the matter was not withdrawn.
Recalling various promises made by the BJP in the 2014 Lok Sabha polls, Stalin said none of them, including the one to bring back black money, had been fulfilled.
"So, this ban, what we eat is now being restricted. A situation has come up where we should eat only what (Prime Minister Narendra) Modi desires. Civil liberties guaranteed by the Constitution are being snatched. Freedom is being snatched," he alleged.
Some IIT-M students took out a procession, urging the institute management to take action against those involved in the attack on the scholar.
A pro-Tamil fringe outfit also staged a protest outside the IIT campus over the assault.
Sooraj, associated with the Ambedkar Periyar Study Circle, a Dalit outfit, was injured in yesterday's assault allegedly by some students claimed to be Sangh Parivar supporters.
These protests continued a day after the Madurai bench of the Madras High Court stayed the operation of the Centre's notification by four weeks.
A division bench headed by Chief Justice Navaniti Prasad Singh observed that its interference in the Centre's notification was not warranted. Later, the PIL was withdrawn by petitioner A G Sunil.
Under relentless opposition attack, Union minister M Venkaiah Naidu had yesterday said issues raised by some state governments and trade organisations with regard to the ban were being examined. The controversial decision is expected to hit export and domestic trade of meat and leather.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
