"It is most unfortunate that the Chief Justice of India made uncharitable comments about me as a lawyer and my conducts in court behind my back," he said in a statement.
A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur, which today cancelled the parole granted to Roy and asked him to surrender back to custody within a week, was very critical of the senior lawyer.
"We don't need respect from lawyers
as much as the institution does but you can't go on brow-beating judges", the judges said clarifying the bench does not have problems with Dhavan.
"One may be very eloquent, scholarly but that doesn't mean he can browbeat the court. You should present your case politely. There should be threshold of tolerance," the bench said after another senior advocate Kapil Sibal tendered unconditional apology for Dhavan's remarks.
However, Dhavan remained defiant and said, "I don't apologise for what happened in court. It is not my fault at all. Cancelling someone's parole on the ground that the lawyer representing the person wanted to give a response on affidavit on something else is unjust."
Referring to the sequence of events of today's hearing Dhavan said "it is the duty of the lawyer to tell the judge where there is failure of justice and due process".
He concluded by saying, "people in high places have enormous power and their duty is to use it wisely with forbearance".
(REOPENS LGD 39)
Sibal made the mention of the matter just before CJI, sitting in different combination of judges, was about to rise for lunch, and apologised on behalf of Roy.
The CJI responded saying that the bench, also comprising justices A R Dave and A K Sikri, was ready to allow an adjournment when it changed its mind due to Dhavan's conduct.
After patiently listening to the bench, Sibal assured, "It will not happen again. It is my word.
