Rape case convict's claim turns false after bone test

Image
Press Trust of India Thane (Maha)
Last Updated : Dec 10 2013 | 2:11 PM IST
A bone ossification test conducted on a rape case convict, who had earlier claimed that he was a minor at the time of crime, has revealed that he was around 20-year-old when he committed the act in 2011.
The bone ossification test report was submitted to the district court here yesterday.
The accused, originally from Rajasthan, had been arrested on charge of raping a six-year-old girl at Bhayander in the district in November 2011.
The trial in the case had begun in February 2013, which got over early last month. During the hearing, the victim had told the court that she had been lured by the accused to a public toilet, where she was raped.
On September 5, the court convicted him. However, just before the court pronounced the quantum of punishment, the accused claimed that he was a juvenile at the time of crime.
Lawyers representing the convict supported the arguments and presented his school leaving certificate, which mentioned his date of birth as May 15, 1994. Besides, the birth certificate issued by a village sarpanch in Rajastan, was submitted in the court bearing the same date.
However, Assistant Public Prosecutor Hemlata Deshmukh challenged the argument and told the Additional Sessions Judge M C Khadke that the accused was 20-years-old at that time.
The prosecution then moved an application in the court seeking permission to conduct a bone ossification test on the accused to ascertain his date of birth. The public prosecutor also challenged the birth certificate submitted by the defence counsel.
The prosecution, however, sought clarification in the case and summoned the sarpanch. "Following the court summons, the village sarpanch attended the hearing recently and later admitted that the birth date certificate submitted could have been fabricated. He said the person who had signed the certificate was never the village head and held no authority to issue this document," Deshmukh said.
The court will now decide the quantum of sentence.
Currently, a person below 18 years of age is treated as a juvenile and under the Juvenile Justice Law, the maximum punishment is three years' confinement at a reformatory home.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 10 2013 | 2:11 PM IST

Next Story