Rape of five-yr-old: Accused claims to be juvenile

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 21 2014 | 7:14 PM IST
A Delhi court has directed the Tihar Jail Superintendent to produce before it the report of ossification test of one of the two youths who claimed that he was a juvenile at the time of his arrest in the rape case of a five-year-old girl here last year.
Additional Sessions Judge Sanjay Garg asked the jail official to bring on April 7 the result of ossification test, which was conducted to determine the age of accused Pradeep Kumar, on the directions of the court.
Pradeep, in his juvenility plea filed through advocate Shalu Jain, contended that he was a minor when he was arrested from Bihar last April.
The counsel said Pradeep does not have any age proof to substantiate his claim.
The court is at present recording statements of prosecution witnesses.
Manoj Shah and Kumar, now in judicial custody, are accused of raping the girl on April 15, 2013 in Gandhi Nagar area in East Delhi.
The child was rescued 40 hours later on April 17. The accused had fled after committing the crime, leaving the girl behind in Manoj's room believing her to be dead. They were later arrested from Bihar.
Police said that some foreign material--three pieces of a candle and one hair oil bottle--was also taken out from the body of the victim and this was also proved by the doctors during recording of their statements in the court.
Earlier, the court had recorded the statements of the child and her parents. The minor's testimony was recorded through video conferencing.
The court had earlier framed charges of raping a minor, unnatural offence, kidnapping, attempt to murder, destruction of evidence and wrongful confinement with common intention under the IPC against the two accused.
It had also framed charges of aggravated sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act which entails a maximum punishment of life term.
Charges of rape and unnatural offence were slapped against the two accused by the court as these two sections were not invoked by the police in its charge sheet.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 21 2014 | 7:14 PM IST

Next Story