Rebekah Brooks describes paying for news as 'normal'

Image
Press Trust of India London
Last Updated : Mar 10 2014 | 9:08 PM IST
Former chief executive of Rupert Murdoch's British newspaper empire, Rebekah Brooks, today justified cash payments to sources of news stories as "part of the normal business".
The former editor of the 'Sun' and erstwhile 'News of the World' tabloids is on trial over allegations of phone hacking as well as conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office by authorising payments to public officials including police officers.
During her cross-examination at the Old Bailey court in London, she stressed that she had never knowingly paid a public official for a story.
"I don't think every cash payment was seen as illegal or evidence of criminality, they had always been there," she said.
"It is the law of the land. I cannot believe there is one journalist in Fleet Street who does not know that is the case [it being illegal to pay public officials]. You would not pay a public official unless it was in the public interest. To pay a serving public officer, it would have to be an incredibly high bar," she added.
When asked by Prosecutor Andrew Edis QC if she cared how her journalists were dealing with public officials, Brooks said "it was a constant dialogue".
On her 12th day in the witness box, Brooks said the 'Sun' may have paid officers for information, such as gossip about a neighbour, that he or she may have picked up off duty.
"I do not think the 'Sun', to my knowledge, made any corrupt payments to police officers during my editorship," she told jurors.
She was also repeatedly asked by Edis if she had thought about whether a military source paid for supplying stories to the 'Sun' was a public official.
The court heard that in 2006 she received a request from a reporter for authorisation to pay 4,500 pounds to a source whose name and details she did not know.
Edis asked: "Did you think at all about whether it was a public official?" Brooks replied: "My assumption was it was not a public official."
The trial is about illegal payments to public officials, allegations of attempts to hide potential evidence and phone hacking and the illegal interception of messages.
Brooks and seven other defendants deny all the charges against them.
Brooks has already been acquitted on a fifth charge in relation to the picture of Prince William at a fancy dress party after the jury was directed to find her not guilty of the charge by the judge.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 10 2014 | 9:08 PM IST

Next Story