'Replacing beef with poultry and eggs would help environment'

Image
Press Trust of India London
Last Updated : Apr 02 2015 | 8:57 PM IST
Cutting global beef consumption and eating protein-rich poultry and eggs instead could lead to major climate benefits, says a new research.
The study by David Bryngelsson from Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden investigated various future scenarios to determine how the climate would be impacted if humans were to change their diet.
The research shows that adopting a diet in which the protein derives from poultry is a smart and inexpensive way to reduce our impact on the climate.
"Cattle ranching is already responsible for 15 per cent of the greenhouse gas emissions that humans cause. The diet we are accustomed to in wealthy countries is not consistent with our climate goals," says Bryngelsson, who recently presented his doctoral thesis on land use, food related greenhouse gas emissions, and climate change.
Even though vegan diet results in less greenhouse gases, Bryngelsson's research shows that we can continue eating animal protein and still make a major contribution to the climate - if we replace beef with poultry and eggs, and cut down on our consumption of milk and cheese.
"Even people who eat an extremely protein-rich LCHF diet with chicken as the base make a greater contribution to the environment than vegetarians who consume a great deal of dairy products".
There might be ethical objections to the current chicken industry, but Bryngelsson believes that climate gains will prevail even with more animal-friendly production methods.
Technical improvements in the production chain can to a certain extent also reduce the food industry's climate impact, but cattle are still the biggest problem as they need a lot of feed and they release methane as they ruminate.
Furthermore, forests are being devastated to make room for the increasing number of cattle.
The study also shows the difference between chicken and beef as regards to area requirements and greenhouse gas emissions.
This is because a hen can have around 150 chicks per year as compared to a cow that can give birth to not quite one calf per year, and because chicks grow extremely quickly and thus absorb a significantly greater proportion of their feed.
Furthermore, cows belch large amounts of methane while chewing on their cud, which is something chickens do not do.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 02 2015 | 8:57 PM IST

Next Story