The three-member panel would be headed by retired Kerala High Court judge Justice C N Ramachandran Nair, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan told reporters here.
The decision to set up the panel under the Commissions of Enquiry Act was taken at the cabinet meeting held here following the findings by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) that the "state's interests were not protected while signing the agreement and there were lapses."
Retired IAS officer K Mohandas and former Indian Audit and Accounts Service official P J Mathew are the other two members of the inquiry commission.
The committee has been given a time frame of six months to complete the probe, the chief minister said.
The agreement for the Vizhinjam International Transhipment Deepwater Multipurpose Seaport was signed with Gujarat-based Adani Ports and SEZ Private Ltd during the previous Congress-led UDF state government headed by Oommen Chandy.
"My only request to the chief minister is that a comparative study of the cost, benefit and investment of the state, deriving from the present agreement and the agreement mooted by the previous V S Achutanandan-led LDF government may also be included in the terms of reference of the inquiry," he said in a Facebook post.
The project was first mooted in 1991 during the then UDF regime headed by Karunakaran and got a push two decades later under the Chandy government. The agreement was signed with the Adani group under Public Private Partnership (PPP) route on Design, Build, Finance, Operate and Transfer basis (DBFOT).
The 40 year period was adopted from 'Model Concession Agreement for State Ports' prepared by the Planning Commission. This agreement was adopted in 2014 for the Vizhinjam port through the cabinet decision, Chandy said.
"All the bid documents, including Model Concession Agreement and its conditions were vetted by the Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance before concurring in principal approval," he said.
CAG report on Public Sector Undertakings for the year ended March 2016 had pointed out lapses on the part of the state government while signing the agreement for implementing the project.
"The interests of the state government were not protected adequately while drawing up the Concession Agreement," the report had said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
