The research shows that people who categorise themselves as being in a relatively high social class spend less time looking at passersby compared with those who are not as well off, a difference that seems to stem from spontaneous processes related to perception and attention.
"Our research documents that other humans are more likely to capture the attention of lower-class individuals than the attention of higher-class individuals," said psychological scientist Pia Dietze of New York University.
Dietze and co-author Eric Knowles hypothesised that our social class affects how relevant others are to us in terms of our own goals and motivations.
Compared with people who come from less-advantaged circumstances, people from relatively privileged backgrounds are likely to be less dependent on others socially; as such, they are less likely to view other people as potentially rewarding, threatening or otherwise worth paying attention.
Dietze and Knowles said this difference in what they call "motivational relevance" is so fundamental that it manifests in basic cognitive processes - like visual attention - that operate quickly and involuntarily.
The participants walked roughly one block while Google Glass recorded whatever they were looking at, and they also completed several survey measures that gauged social class.
In one measure, for example, participants categorised themselves as belonging to either the poor, the working class, the middle class, the upper-middle class, or the upper class.
Later, an independent group of raters watched the recordings and noted the various people and things each Glass wearer looked at and for how long.
The results indicate that social class did not seem to play a role in how many times Glass wearers looked at other people.
However, social class was associated with how much time they spent looking at passersby: Participants who categorised themselves as being in a higher social class spent less time looking at other people than those who placed themselves in a lower social class.
Two follow-up studies using more precise eye tracking technology showed similar results: Higher-class participants spent less time looking at people in a street scene than did their lower-class peers.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
