Rights bodies call for legal framework to regulate surrogacy

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 19 2014 | 9:06 PM IST
With India becoming a hub for surrogacy, human rights bodies have called for rights-based legal framework to safeguard the interests of all major stakeholders.
The unregulated reproductive tourism industry of 'procreating' through surrogacy is rapidly increasing in India while there is still no legal provision to safeguard the interests of all the major stakeholders involved in the surrogacy arrangement, said Centre for Social Research (CSR).
According to a study conducted by CSR in 2011-12, though the Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Regulation Bill, 2010 did bring forth certain important points for the legal framework to be based on, it has left out many crucial issues relating to surrogacy arrangements.
"There are many issues besides sex selection and exploitation of the poor surrogate mothers. There are countries that do not allow surrogacy, then what would the nationality of the child be when the intended parents are from that country? About 48 per cent couples opting for surrogacy are foreigners," said Ranjana Kumari, Director of Centre for Social Research.
Quoting the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) Director, the survey claimed approximately 2,000 babies are born every year through commercial surrogacy. CII figures claim that surrogacy is a $2.3 billion industry in India, because it is largely unregulated and cheap. Clinics function in tight cliques, with unrelated centres like dental clinics sometimes assisting fertility clinics.
Although there are no fixed rules related to the amount of compensation for the surrogate mother, it is arbitrarily decided by the clinics. Often the woman who delivers the baby is paid very less for it. Though the couple who wants to have a baby through surrogate mothers pays anything between Rs 2 lakh to Rs 5 lakh to agents, the woman who delivers the baby gets only Rs 75,000 to Rs 1 lakh, the report claimed.
The "rent-a-womb" procedure has thrown up a major debate whether it should be banned like a majority of the countries have done or should there be a law to regulate it.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 19 2014 | 9:06 PM IST

Next Story