Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi had recently expressed his view that despite his retirement from the apex court, Sen could continue to head the panel as the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968 is silent on the issue on whether a judge can head the committee despite his retirement from the court.
He had left it to the Rajya Sabha Chairman Hamid Ansari to take a call on whether he wants Sen to continue or replace him with a sitting judge.
The law ministry had, however, said that Sen was heading the panel by virtue of being a sitting judge of the Supreme Court and, hence he should be replaced. Sen was a sitting Supreme Court judge when he was appointed the chief of the panel in April last year.
Vice-President Ansari decided to reconstitute the committee.
A Rajya Sabha notification issued on Wednesday said that in partial modification of its earlier notification, "the Chairman, Rajya Sabha has re-constituted, for the purpose of making an investigation into the grounds on which the removal of Justice S K Gangele of the Madhya Pradesh High Court is prayed for, a Committee consisting of the following three Members:- Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Supreme Court of India, Manjula Chellur, Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court and K K Venugopal, senior advocate, Supreme Court of India".
Chellur and Venugopal were already a part of the committee.
On the stand taken by the law ministry that Sen should not continue as he headed the panel by virtue of being a SC judge, the AG had said that even the opposite view "is also not contrary to law".
The ministry was also asked if another sitting SC judge is appointed in place of Justice Sen, will the panel start its investigation afresh or continue from where the Sen panel had left.
The AG had said the probe by the committee could recommence from the stage it was on December 31 when Sen retired.
In April last year, Ansari had set up the three-member panel to investigate sexual harassment charge against Gangele.
In March last year, 58 MPs had submitted a motion to Ansari for initiating impeachment proceedings against Gangele for alleged sexual harassment of a woman judge in Gwalior. The motion was admitted by Ansari.
The motion lists three "grounds of misconduct" for impeachment. "Sexual harassment" of the woman judge, "victimisation" of the judge "for not submitting to his illegal and immoral demands", including but not limited to, transferring her from Gwalior to Sidhi, and "misusing" his position as the administrative judge of the MP High Court to use the subordinate judiciary to victimise the judge.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app