Members of a number of Opposition parties urged the government to take the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly into confidence before getting The Collection of Statistics (Amendment) Bill, 2017 passed.
Responding to the issues raised by various members regarding the special status of J&K, Statistics Minister D V Sadanand Gowda said the provisions of the bill do not infringe upon the rights of Kashmiris and the Centre was not overriding Article 370 or encroaching upon the powers of the state government.
While moving the amendment bill in the Rajya Sabha for passage, said it had been brought to address the "legislative vacuum" as collection of statistical data from Jammu and Kashmir was not possible.
He noted that the statistical data and information is an important element for planning as well as implementation of various projects.
"...In the large interest of the country and the state, is it not fair on our part to go ahead," the Minister asked.
Referring to a statement by his colleague in the Congress party Jairam Ramesh, Azad said the party is not opposed to the bill but everyone knows that Jammu and Kashmior has special status under Article 370 of the Constitution.
He said the Centre should understand the implications as the situation is Kashmir is really bad since the last 30 years.
Azad alleged that the Centre had not consulted the state government or the Opposition in the matter.
Azad alleged that the BJP had differing views on the Article 370 and wanted to abolish it.
He said young girls were being tutored for spreading misinformation through WhatsApp regarding the special status accorded to Jammu and Kashmir.
He appealed to the government to understand the sensitivity of the matter, warning that otherwise it will have to face the consequences.
Jairam Ramesh wanted to know what exactly was the legislative vacuum and what were the difficulties in getting data.
Responding to him, the minister asked, "If I get more statisitical data from the state, is it not possible for the Centre to assist the state more?"
He added, "When it does not infringe upon the rights of Kashmiris, when we are not overriding Article 370 or we are not encroaching upon the powers of the state government, and in the large interest if the country and the state, is it not fair on our part to go ahead?"
Gowda said the Centre had written to the state government in 2009 after the earlier bill, in which J&K had been kept out, was passed here.
He said there are so many statistical data not available regarding Kashmir "which hurts the development of the nation and Kashmir".
After the Minister finished his reply, Azad shot back, saying: "We have warned you, cautioned you. Inspite of the Opposition requesting you, the ruling party has gone ahead. So it will be squarely responsible if anything goes wrong."
According to the statement of objects and reason of the bill, "the amendments proposed in the bill, inter alia, seek to extend the Statistics Act 2008, to the state of Jammu and Kashmir in so far as it relates to any Statistical survey relating to any matter falling under any of the entries specified in List I (Union List) or List III (Concurrent List) in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution as applicable to that state".
Ramesh said the Finance Minister of Jammu and Kashmir was not aware about this bill till it was passed by the Lok Sabha.
Noting that J&K enjoys special status under the Constitution, Ramesh said the atomosphere and environment in Kashmir was "sensitive".
The sensitivities need to be understood, he said, adding Parliament should not be seen doing this unilaterally.
He said the amendement bill has been brought to remove the deficiencies in the earlier law.
AIADMK member S R Balasubramaniam said it is not proper to pass this bill without the concurrence of J&K government.
Harivansh of JD (U) also said this bill should have been passed after taking concurrence of the state government.
C P Narayanan of CPI (M) stressed that data and statistics should be dealt scientifically.
Sarojini Hembram (BJD) agreed with the doubts raised by Jairam Ramesh and said it would not be good to pass this bill without taking concurrence of the state government.
Vijaysai Reddy (YSR Congress) expressed concern over possibility of misuse of data and information by parties in power at the Centre and States. He spoke about the need to ensure privacy of data.
D Raja (CPI) asked the government whether there was any engagement with the J&K government in this whole exercise.
He said the amendment bill should be in accordance with Article 370 of the Constitution.
K Rahman Khan (Cong) said the consent of J&K government is necessary and it was not right to meddle with Article 370.
Vikas Mahatme (BJP) said the situation in J&K could be improved through data and statistics.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
