Kurien, who also heads the panel, however, said the committee cannot on its own enlarge its scope to include phone-tapping of MPs unless asked to look into the issue by the House.
As the House was unanimous in seeking a review, the committee is "re-committed to re-examine" its 61st report, he said.
In its report, the panel had opinioned that the act of accessing call data records (CDRs) in an unauthorized manner, though sinister and punishable in the eyes of the law, "does not seem to cause any hindrance of obstruction in the functioning of a Member of Parliament so as to attract breach of his parliamentary privileges."
Stating that he has gone through the rules, Kurien said the mandate of the Committee is to examine every issue referred to it.
"The Committee does not take matters suo motu," he said adding Sharma can give a notice and seek passage of the motion by the House or alternatively give notice to the Chairman.
Kurien had on May 7 stated that the panel's report was before the House and the House is supreme and it could decide to discuss, accept or reject the report.
