RS rejects amendments on women's reservation bill

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 07 2018 | 8:50 PM IST
Rajya Sabha today rejected three amendments seeking inclusion of a passage on the Women Reservation Bill in the President's address to the joint sitting of Parliament, but the government said it was ready for a discussion on it.
The Motion of Thanks for the President's address was passed by a voice vote in the Upper House after the Prime Minister's reply to the debate.
The amendment, proposed by T K Rangarajan of CPI(M), was negated by division with 57 members in favour and 86 against. The amendment sought inclusion of the phrase: "but regret that there is no mention in the Address about the Government's failure to pass Women Reservation Bill."
The result of division evoked sharp response from the former union minister and Congress leader Renuka Chowdhury saying "You are all anti-women. Thank You."
Congress and other opposition members also supported Chowdhury saying "Sharam Karo, Sharam Karo" (shame, shame).
Reacting to this, Information and Broadcasting Minister Smriti Zubin Irani said "You have no right to say that."
The women's bill was passed during the UPA rule in Rajya Sabha in March 2010, but could not be passed in Lok Sabha.
Leader of Opposition Ghulam Nabi Azad said,"We passed this bill in this House. But some coalition members did not agree on the bill (in the Lower House)."
Responding on the division pressed by Rangarajan, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said "We will try to call a meeting of all political parties."
But Rangarajan pressed for a division, saying "Only after pressing for division, the government says they agree to discuss the bill. I am pressing for it now."
Thereafter, another related amendment 245 by CPI leader D Raja provided for including "regret that the address does not mention about the delay in passing the legislation on reservation for women in Parliament and state assemblies."
It was also put to vote and rejected by a voice vote.
Similarly, an amendment by Congress leader Husain Dalwai which provided for including "regret that the address does not mention about the lack of interest of the government to introduce the Women Reservation Bill on priority basis," was also rejected by a voice vote.
As many as 324 amendments were proposed by the members in the Presidents' Address. All of them were either rejected or withdrawn.
Among the amendments, some sought inclusion of mention of the growing attacks on freedom of speech and reference to the triple talaq bill.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 07 2018 | 8:50 PM IST

Next Story