It has also sought decrease in the "threshold limit" (of workers employed) of factories to bring them under the purview of Factories Act. Since lessor number of workers are employed these days due to mechanisation, factories with fewer workers also need to be made liable and accountable under the Act.
The BMS, which is holding tripartite talks on the proposed amendments in Factories Act today, has also raised objections to proposed handing over of power to frame rules to Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Board of technocrats, which it has termed as "highly centralised".
"Working hours are increased in the case of spread over, overtime, weekly hours etc. Due to mechanisation, the production which a worker was making 100 years ago can now be made within half the time or less. So the present working time has to be decreased to 6 hours or less as per a scientific study," the Sangh said in its objections.
"We have given a charter to our objections and demands to the Labour Minister. We are also putting across our views during the tripartite talks. If government does not agree to our demands, we will then agitate and take to the streets," BMS general secretary Virjesh Upadhyay told PTI.
It said, "the Board should be a tripartite body since welfare of workers, working hours, leave, health and safety of workers etc. Are covered under the amendments."
In its demand charter, the BMS has also said factories with upto 40 workers are exempted. But, factories and manufacturing units running with 100 workers 40 years ago can now run with less than 20 workers due to increased mechanisation and computerisation. "So the threshold limit has to be reduced and not increased," it said.
BMS also raised objections on women and adolescent workers having to work near dangerous machines.
The BMS said "Ease of living" is equally important along with "ease of doing business" and register books of workers are replaced by electronic web enabled service.
"Employment of young persons, children etc. Are to be made according to ILO standards," it said while objecting to the proposal.
