A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar said as the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan has made a big impact across the nation, the Centre, the Delhi government and the other authorities should do something similar.
The bench pulled up the authorities for miserably failing to take action against the offenders of such defacements.
It said there was public ignorance on the gravity of punishment involved in the act of defacement.
The bench termed it a "serious issue" and asked the government, civic bodies and students who won the Delhi University Students Union (DUSU) polls to roll out an action plan to prevent defacing of public buildings during the election campaigns.
DUSU president Rocky Tuseed, who was present in the court and was represented by advocate Aman Panwar, submitted that it was their "moral responsibility".
The student leader's counsel submitted that a meeting was held to discuss how to clean up public and private places which are defaced due to the DUSU polls and at the same time various ways in which, the beautification of Delhi city can be done.
It asked Dean of Students' Welfare of Delhi University, all the civic bodies, DMRC, people from Delhi School of Art, School of Planning and Architecture and police to convene a meeting of all concerned and chalk out a plan to protect public property.
The bench asked the DU to frame proper guidelines for conducting DUSU elections in future taking on board suggestion placed by the petitioner and all other stake holders with a view to come with a comprehensive solution.
The court specifically directed that a campaign on the lines of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan is required across Delhi to deal with "serious issue" of defacement.
"Inform people at large through jingles and other mode of communication. You (governments) run campaign on lines of the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, chikungunya and dengue," the bench said and asked the counsel for the Centre and the Delhi government, why can't they do it.
It asked the Delhi government's counsel Sanjoy Ghose to place the action plan before it by December 12.
The court suggested places like India Gate, in and around the Delhi High Court beyond the radius of half a kilometre, etc best suited for such awareness drive.
The bench was also hearing a plea by another advocate Sahil Sharma seeking to refurbish the properties defaced during the polls and for taking action against the candidates responsible.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
