After Putin said that Ukraine was responsible for the crash, Russian state television focused on several theories that pinned the blame accordingly.
"The aim could have been Plane No. 1," Russia 24 television said, referring to Putin's presidential jet, quoting an Interfax civil aviation source as saying the logo on the Malaysian plane's wing "looks like the Russian tricolour."
To back up the claim, it aired television footage of a hawkishly pro-NATO former Ukraine defence minister, Anatoliy Grytsenko, saying someone should kill Putin.
Television reports also centred on an alleged second plane that several witnesses said they saw at the scene.
Channel One cited a local resident who said she saw another plane fly off as the Malaysian jet burned on the ground.
"One plane fell and the second one flew over to the side, towards Dnipropetrovsk," she said.
"It's possible that in (her) words is the solution to the mystery," Channel One's news anchor said, suggesting that the second plane was involved in the liner's crash.
"So far we don't know where the plane is and what happened to the pilot. Local residents said they saw a person parachuting down in the area of the tragedy," she said.
Casting doubt on Ukraine's suggestion that the rebels were behind the crash, Channel One stressed that the Kiev authorities "fully control the situation in the air."
It also suggested that Ukraine's announcement of a terrorist attack came suspiciously soon after the event.
"It's not possible to find out so quickly where, what and why. That means they shot it down themselves," Channel One quoted a test pilot, Ruben Yesayan, as saying.
