There was no chaotic scene or untoward incident today, as was witnessed on March 4, 2014, when black ink was thrown on his face as he was ordered to be sent to Tihar Jail. He had come out on parole on May 6, 2016 on humanitarian ground due to the passing away of his mother.
Murmurings were rife in the apex court today whether Roy will meet the same fate as was witnessed a little over three years ago.
However, the man of the moment came into the radar of the lensmen at 01:30 pm when he alighted from a white Mercedes Benz.
While photo-journalists jostled to try to get the best snaps, security personnel ensured that he has a safe passage to the courtroom where cops had take positions, both inside and outside, and asking people who were not in black and white robes about their identity.
Dressed in a cream colour bandi and Khaki trouser, Roy accompanied by some junior lawyers reached the courtroom at 01:37 pm and was given a place to sit in the second row.
A little later, his lawyer and senior advocate Kapil Sibal also arrived and both of them greeted each other.
The bench comprising Justices Dipak Misra, Ranjan Gogoi and A K Sikri assembled few minutes after 02:00 pm and straightaway commenced the business of the court which lasted nearly an hour.
Today the bench only asked Roy "do you intend to pay the money?"
The Sahara Chief stood up and said "I am trying my best".
On his short reply, the bench said, "we are warning you, if the cheques are not cleared and amount is not coming frequently, we will be compelled to send you to Tihar jail straightaway from here".
Last time, the Sahara chief had tried to impress the court by stating that "Ours is a beautiful story, you will love and pat us".
"It is a beautiful human story. If you hear our story, you will love us and you will pat us," he had said.
However, the then bench comprising Justices J S Khehar (present Chief Justice) and K S Radhakrishnan (since retired) had said "we will love you if you pay the investors' money. We will love you if you obey the rule of law. We will love you if you comply with our judgement."
Today too, the bench said it was concerned that money should come.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
