Salman knew his action may kill people: trial court judge

Actor Salman Khan had the knowledge that driving in a rash and negligent manner under the influence of liquor might result in death of people, Mumbai sessions court judge D W Deshpande said, convicting him of culpable homicide in the 2002 hit-and-run case.
In the verdict delivered yesterday, Deshpande, who sentenced the popular actor to five years rigorous imprisonment, said since Salman lived in the area where the accident took place, he had the knowledge that poor people used to sleep on the pavement.
"The accused is a well-known actor and had knowledge that one should not drive vehicle without licence...He also had knowledge that one should not drive after consuming liquor and that too in late night," he said.

"These are the basic rules. The accused is a regular visitor to 'Rain Bar' as disclosed by witnesses. Prosecution witness 17, Mark D'souza has also said that Salman regularly passed by the area where American Express laundry is located," the judge said in the 240-page verdict.
Salman was charged with ramming the bakery adjacent to the American Express laundry with his Toyota Land Cruiser in suburban Bandra, killing one person and injuring four others sleeping on the pavement outside.
The judgement further said the accused had the knowledge that people slept on footpath outside the shops near American Express laundry because he lived in the same area.

"In short, the accused was having knowledge that the poor labourers were sleeping outside the laundry. He was also having knowledge that he was not possessing licence to drive at the time of incident. Also, he had the knowledge that he should not drive after consumption of liquor.
"Moreover, in blood test, the accused was found to have 0.062 mg of alcohol content in blood stream which shows that he was under the influence of liquor," said the judge.
Under the influence of liquor it is difficult for a person driving the car to concentrate on driving, particularly at night, and thus he had the knowledge that his act might endanger lives of other persons, the judgement said.