The Centre's decision to grant more power and funds to 10 autonomous councils in the Northeastern region failed to satisfy political parties of Tripura, except the ruling BJP.
Even the Indigenous People's front of Tripura (IPFT), the sole ally of the saffron party in the state, said the Centre's move would not be able to fulfil the aspiration of the tribal people of the state.
Aiming to woo the tribal population in the Northeast ahead of the Lok Sabha polls, the Union Cabinet Wednesday approved constitutional amendments to increase the powers of the autonomous councils in the Sixth Schedule areas of the Northeast.
While the BJP termed the decision 'historic', the main opposition CPI(M) said there is nothing new in the proposed amendment.
"We have long been demanding a separate Twipraland for the tribals. We think a separate state by carving out the Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council can only solve our problems," IPFT spokesperson Mangal Debbarma said.
Rampada Jamatia, Tripura BJP tribal wing president, said this "historic decision" will be able to bring a lot of funds for development of tribal areas.
"We had demanded that the Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council (TTAADC) be made a state council. They made it a Territorial council. But we have no problem with it," Jamatia said.
The amendments propose to rename the TTAADC as the Tripura Tribal Area Autonomous Territorial Council as the present jurisdiction of these councils extend to more than one districts.
In a statement, the CPI(M) said there is nothing new in the proposed amendments to empower the tribal councils of the region.
The party demanded that monetary assistance to the council be continued from the tribal sub-plan and other sectors and the sanctions should not be stopped in the name of enhancing grants from the Finance Commission.
The amendment proposed 30 per cent reservation of seats in village councils and urban civil bodies in the Sixth Schedule areas, but did not make any proposal for reservation of seats in the Tribal council, it said.
The CPI(M) also demanded inclusion of the tribal language Kokbarak in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution.
The Indigenous National Party of Twipra (INPT) stated that the proposed amendment would not be beneficial for the tribal council in the state.
INPT president Bijoy Kumar Hrangkhawl said, "When the amendment proposed increasing the number of seats in the councils in other states of the region, TTAADC is not there in the list. It is discrimination. We demand that the number of seats for TTAADC be raised."
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
