The observation came from a bench of Justices J Chelameswar and A M Sapre when the counsel for the housing society said the Centre be asked to ensure maintenance of the building as there was no power connection and hence, the lifts are not working and there would be safety concerns in case of any mis-happening.
Various equipments including lifts, power generator, fire-fighting equipment and a pump house, installed in the apartment premises, are not working at present, the counsel for the society said.
During the hearing, the bench also said if the society won the case, then why would it ask the Centre to pay for maintenance.
The court asked the counsel for the housing society to take instruction and apprise it on September 2 as to whether it was willing to pay for the maintenance.
Meanwhile, the Centre told the apex court that it has not yet received the entire possession of the building as out of 104 flats, 93 are locked and the keys are not with it.
The bench had also said that the word "secure" meant that there will be no razing.
It had also issued notices on a batch of pleas, filed against the Bombay High Court decision ordering demolition, by the housing society and some allottees.
Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar had said that the building in question was built on defence land and the Director of Military Estate or his nominee would take over its possession.
In its order, the HC bench had asked the Ministry of Environment and Forest to carry out the demolition at the expense of petitioners (Adarsh Society).
It had also asked the Centre and Maharashtra Government to consider initiating civil and criminal proceedings against bureaucrats, ministers and politicians for misuse and abuse of power to get plots under the scheme, originally meant for Kargil war heroes and war widows.
In February this year, the Maharashtra Governor accorded sanction to the CBI to prosecute Chavan under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code in the case.
In 2011, the state government had set up a two-member judicial commission headed by Justice J A Patil to inquire into the scam.
After probing the issue for over two years, it submitted its report in 2013, which found that there had been 25 illegal allotments, including 22 purchases made by proxy.
In January 2011, the union ministry of environment and forest had issued a demolition order mainly on the ground that the society did not have CRZ clearance.
Adarsh Society had filed a petition in 2011 in the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition order issued by the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests.
The Defence Ministry had also filed a petition in the high court seeking implementation of its demolition order, besides filing a title suit in the high court claiming it was the owner of the plot on which the plush Adarsh Society building stands in South Mumbai.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
