SC asks CBI officers to assail their transfers at appropriate forum

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 08 2019 | 9:00 PM IST

CBI officers who were transferred overnight to various places after the Centre's decision to divest the probe agency's Director Alok Kumar Verma of his powers, failed to get any relief from the Supreme Court on Tuesday which asked them to approach appropriate forum assailing their transfers.

Soon after taking over the role of CBI director, M Nageswara Rao, a 1986-batch IPS officer from Odisha cadre, transferred over many officers, including M K Sinha and A K Bassi who were who were probing special Director Rakesh Asthana in an alleged bribery case.

Verma, who was divested of his powers and sent on leave on October 23 by the Central Vigilance Commission and the Department of Personnel and Traning (DoPT), had moved the apex court challenging the decision.

A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi allowed Verma to come back as the CBI Director, albeit with his wings clipped, and gave a jolt to the Centre and the CVC by setting aside their orders divesting him of his powers and sending him on leave.

CBI officers including DIG M K Sinha, a 2000 batch IPS officer from Andhra Pradesh cadre and Dy SP A K Bassi, who were transferred to Nagpur and Andaman and Nicobar Islands respectively, had filed separate interim applications in the pending plea of Verma against their overnight transfers.

The apex court said it had dealt with the legality of the orders of the Centre and the CVC divesting Verma of his powers and appointing Rao as the interim CBI Director and would not go into the consequential transfer orders.

"Coming to the several IAs (interim applications) filed, we are of the view that the orders of transfer etc impugned/mentioned in the said IAs are a sequel of the three ordersdated23rdOctober,2018which were specifically impugned inthewritpetitions.Aswehave answered thewritpetitionsinthemanner...,
"Wedo not considerit necessary to examine the correctness of the further/consequential orders of transfer etc. and thattooonthe basis of interlocutory applications filed in pending writ petitions underArticle32oftheConstitution."

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 08 2019 | 9:00 PM IST

Next Story