The top court, in its verdict on November 21, 2016, had taken serious note of infrastructural inadequacy and other problems faced by consumer courts across the country and passed a slew of directions for a "systemic overhaul" so that the Consumer Protection Act does not become a "dead letter".
Referring to a report submitted by a top court-appointed committee headed by former Supreme Court judge Justice Arijit Pasayat on the state of consumer courts, it had then asked the Centre to frame in four months the model rules for adoption by the state governments and submit them before it for approval.
"List the matter for further proceedings on April 27," the bench said.
Earlier, the bench had sought the ASG's assistance in "formulating appropriate directions to ensure that proper infrastructure is made available at all levels of the consumer fora across the country."
It had also asked the Centre to file a comprehensive status report indicating compliance with the directions issued by the court in its judgement.
"A systemic overhaul of the entire infrastructure is necessary if the Consumer Protection Act is not to become a dead letter. With the proliferation of goods and services in a rapidly growing economy, Parliament envisaged the enactment to be the corner-stone of a vibrant consumer movement. Reality has been distant from the aspirations of the law,"it had said.
It had asked the Centre to frame model rules, prescribing objective norms for implementing the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act in regard to the appointment of members of the district fora, State Commissions and the National Commission.
It had said these rules should be finalised after due consultation with the President of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, within the stipulated period.
It had noted that the state governments had failed to respond to the suggestions of the committee for streamlining the state of affairs and the quality of the presiding members and especially of non-judicial members at the state and district levels, which was "poor".
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
