SC imposes costs on 13 states, 2 UTs for not filling vacancies

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 06 2017 | 9:42 PM IST
Acting firmly, the Supreme Court has slapped a fine of Rs 50,000 each against 13 states and two Union territories for not filling up vacancies in their State Commission for Child Rights (SCCR), saying a central law must be adhered to.
A bench comprising Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta noted that these states were in "clear violation" of section 18 of the Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005 which deals with appointment of a chairperson and other members of such a commission.
The bench imposed the fine on Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Goa, Bihar, Gujarat, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Tripura and Uttarakhand and Union terrotories of Chandigarh and Delhi.
"Under the circumstances, these governments should fill up all the vacancies of the chairperson/members under the 2005 Act within four weeks...Subject to payment of costs of Rs 50,000 to be deposited by each government within three weeks with the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee for utilisation in juvenile justice issues," it said.
The court also said that if the appointments are not made, "we may require the presence of the secretary of the women and child development department in the government concerned to explain the difficulty in doing so and for violating the law".
"We may record the fact that the statute referred to is a parliamentary law and the provisions thereof must be adhered to by the governments," the bench said and posted the matter for hearing to July 11.
The court had earlier asked the Centre to ensure that the state commission for protection of child rights was in place in every state and Union territory.
The bench was hearing a PIL seeking implementation of the Juvenile Justice Act and its rules. The apex court had earlier questioned the functioning of the juvenile justice boards and had sought details of the pendency of cases, frequency of sittings, vacancy of posts and other related issues.
The court's directions had come on a plea which was filed in 2005 by petitioner Sampurna Behrua about the governments' apathy in implementing the welfare legislation.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 06 2017 | 9:42 PM IST

Next Story