SC refuses to direct CBI probe in Mathura violence

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 07 2016 | 5:13 PM IST
The Supreme Court today refused to to order a CBI probe into the recent violence in Mathura that left 29 people including two policemen dead, saying it was for the state government to decide.
"From your petition, there is no evidence to suggest there is any lapse on the part of state investigating agency or no steps are being taken for fair probe. Without any evidence that state investigating agencies are not working properly, courts cannot interfere," a vacation bench comprising Justices P C Ghose and Amitava Roy said.
The bench said that petitioner Ashwini Upadhaya cannot approach the apex court through a PIL when a plea on similar issue is already pending before the Allahabad High Court.
"You approach the Allahabad High Court for the remedy," the bench said.
It further said it was not inclined to pass any order and courts cannot order a CBI probe as "a matter of routine as it is for the state government concerned to decide on the issue of handing over the probe to CBI".
It did not allow the submission of senior advocate Geeta Luthra, appearing for Upadhaya, that the petition before the High Court was limited on the issue of encroachment of the park and that has nothing to do with the subsequent violence.
The bench asked the petitioner to withdraw the petition and termed it as dismissed as withdrawn.
The apex court had yesterday agreed to hear the plea which had sought an urgent hearing saying CBI probe was necessary considering the gravity of the violence.
29 people, including Mathura SP Mukul Dwivedi and SHO Santosh Kumar Yadav, were killed in the clash between the police and encroachers that broke out in the city on June 2 when police tried to evict illegal occupants, believed to be of Azad Bharat Vidhik Vaicharik Kranti Satyagrahi, from Jawahar Bagh on Allahabad High Court orders.
Upadhyay, in his plea, had said the court may also take suo motu cognizance of the matter and direct the CBI enquiry, as "it is necessary to find out the truth, root cause of the incident and nexus among executive, legislature and the said group".
The petitioner had sought a direction to the state and the Centre for framing of a uniform policy for compensation for families of the deceased in such cases.
It had also claimed that while the union government was ready for a CBI inquiry into the incident, the state government was developing a cold feet in recommending it.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 07 2016 | 5:13 PM IST

Next Story