The court said the grounds raised by the company and its promotors Ravi and Anshuman Ruia were considered by another bench, which had not found merit in their contention that the case be heard by a magisterial court as there was no charge under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA).
"We are of the view that the petitioners are attempting to raise submissions which have already been rejected by this Court by its judgment dated July 1, 2013," a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and justices A K Sikri and R Nariman said.
An apex court bench on July 1, 2013 had rejected the pleas of Essar Teleholdings and Loop Telecom that they and their promoters cannot be tried in a case by special CBI court and had directed that all cases pertaining to the scam should be heard by it.
Today, the bench refused to accept Essar's contention that a Special Judge appointed to try PCA cases cannot go into non-PCA cases unless there is a causal link between such cases and the corruption cases, when they can be tried together.
It said that since the apex court has held that the March 15, 2011 administrative order of the High court was valid, it is clear that even a Penal Code offence by itself would be within the Special Judge's jurisdiction as the order gives power to the Special Court to decide all offences pertaining to the 2G scam.
