"We thus find that the Appellate Tribunal is wholly incorrect in accepting the case of waiver put forward by learned counsel for Sasan, and is equally incorrect in absolving the independent engineer for the test certificate given by him on March 30, 2013.
"We, therefore, set aside the Appellate Tribunal's judgement, and reinstate the judgement dated August 8, 2014 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission," a bench of justices Kurian Joseph and R F Nariman said.
The company was allowed by the APTEL to recover Rs 1,050 crore dues from procurer states' distribution companies.
The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) in its March 31 order had upheld the Sasan Power Ltd's commercial operational date (COD) claim that the first unit of 660 MW started its commercial operation on March 31, 2013 and directed procurers to pay Rs 1050 crore to the UMPP.
Besides All India Power Engineers Federation, power distribution companies such as Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam, MP Management Company, Haryana Power Generation Corporation (now Haryana Power Purchase Centre), U.P Power Corporation and Punjab State Power Corporation had challenged the APTEL order which was in favour of Sasan UMPP.
The dispute pertained to the date from which Sasan project started commercial supply of power to the distribution firms.
While Sasan UMPP said the start date is March 31, 2013, the distribution firms claimed that it was August 16, 2013.
The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC), on
August 8, 2014, had held that the commercial operation date was August 16, 2013.
It had allowed the plea of power distribution companies that the electricity supplied between March 31, 2013 and August 16, 2013 was 'infirm power' or electricity injected into the grid prior to the start of commercial operations.
The power distribution companies then moved the Supreme Court against the APTEL order.
The apex court, in its 63-page verdict, said the public interest has to be kept in mind when the question of waiver, in favour of the generator of electricity, is considered.
"We have also pointed out that the Appellate Tribunal's finding that the Independent Engineer's test certificate can pass muster and that there is a waiver on facts is not a possible conclusion, and such finding is, therefore, perverse and hence set aside," it said.
Sasan UMPP was incorporated as a special purpose vehicle by the Power Finance Corporation to implement the project.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
