The Orissa High Court dismissing a PIL on it has observed that the Hospital diktat on journalists had been taken in public interest and does not warrant any (judicial) interference.
A division bench headed by Chief Justice Amitava Roy said: "The restraint on doctors in their interaction with the media or the entry of media personnel to (the hospital) without the prior approval of the superintendent of the hospital, in our estimate, cannot by any means be construed to be illegal, unauthorised or arbitrary."
The circular was challenged in the High Court by the Nationalist Lawyers' Forum and India Media Centre through its counsel Nishikant Mishra alleging that the impugned circular was an infraction of Constitutional rights of the journalists.
The High Court however, was of the opinion that the petitioners' plea was "unsustainable".
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
