While Sebi's investigation did not bring out "the disproportionate gain or unfair advantages" to the three noticees, they were issued summons on multiple occasions and they failed to provide the information.
"This indicates the repetitive and wilful nature of their offence," Sebi said in an order while adding that loss to investors as a result of non-submission of information by noticees was brought out in the investigation report.
The regulator had conducted investigation in the scrip of Agnite Education, formerly known as Teledata Informatics, and possible violation of various Sebi provisions during March-December 2007, based on the reference from the Economic Offences Wing of the Brihan Mumbai Police.
The EOW informed the Sebi that Talati was known to Jimmy Pande, the individual in question, for 10 years.
Talati introduced Madhu and Sudhir Jhunjhunwala as experts in the securities market and the couple promised Pande minimum 20 per cent returns on investments with them within 6 months.
"After considerable time when Madhu and Sudhir Jhunjhunwala failed to return the amount, Jimmy Pande lodged complaint with the EOW, Brihan Mumbai Police," stated the Sebi order.
During the course of investigation by the EOW, Sudhir Jhunjhunwala stated that Talati had started visiting his office since December 2006 and began trading through their accounts.
Jhunjhunwala also said Rs 6 crore were deposited in Madhu's account by the management of Teledata Informatics Ltd and Pande is their office bearer. He also alleged that Talati indulged in insider trading while trading through his account.
The couple represented before Sebi that they were engaged in the stock market to earn their living and they were falsely induced by Talati.
The couple said they were "only financiers to the entire deal and it was Talati who was the key person who had done all the business, transaction and deals..." and they actually incurred huge losses themselves in the deal.
While no reply was received from Talati, all the three noticees failed to appear for personal hearing thereafter.
"If persons are allowed to flout the summons issued to them during the course of the investigation, Sebi will not be able to discharge its statutory obligations in protecting the interests of the investors and safeguarding the integrity of the securities market," the regulator said.
Sebi further said that as the three individuals did not provide the information, it "thwarted" the attempts of the regulator to effectively gather vital evidence for the timely conclusion of the investigation proceedings.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
